Where we foster excellence in education that challenges students of every background to develop their intellect, character, and abilities; to assist students in achieving their educational and career goals; and to be responsive to the greater community.
Accreditation is a rigorous process that confirms the quality and integrity of an institution. It ensures that colleges meet nationally recognized standards of educational excellence, giving students and the public confidence that course credits, associate degrees, and certificates will be accepted for transfer and recognized by employers. Accreditation also affirms that IVC continues to improve through self-reflection and accountability—demonstrating a deep commitment to student success and community impact since its first accreditation in 1962.
Imperial Valley College is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, Western Association of Schools and Colleges (ACCJC/WASC), 428 J Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814, (415) 506-0234, an institutional accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education. More information, including details on how to file complaints, is available at www.accjc.org
Questions or comments may be directed to IVC’s Accreditation Liaison Officer, Alexis Villa.
The Commission accepts third-party comments at any time regarding an institution’s compliance with eligibility requirements, accreditation standards, or Commission policies. Comments must be written, signed, and include the correspondent’s name, affiliation, return address, and phone number. Institutions are given the opportunity to review applicable comments prior to Commission consideration.
Individuals who wish to comment on institutions undergoing review during the current semester should use the official Third Party Comment Form, ensuring submission at least five weeks prior to the scheduled Commission meeting.
For more information access the Third Party Comment Form.
As part of the accreditation site visit, Imperial Valley College invites students, faculty, staff, and community members to participate in an Accreditation College Open Forum. This session is designed to provide the visiting ACCJC team with valuable feedback and perspectives from the broader college community.
Date: Thursday, October 2, 2025
Time: 2:40 p.m. – 3:40 p.m.
Format: Virtual via Zoom: https://imperial-edu.zoom.us/j/82338823141
This forum is open to the entire campus community and the public. Please note that executive administrators and governing board members may not participate in this session. All attendees will be asked to update their display name before entering the virtual forum.
As part of the accreditation review process, a team from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) will visit Imperial Valley College and host a community forum. The team members include:
Erika Endrijonas, Ph.D.
Superintendent/President
2025 Institutional Self Evaluation Report (ISER)
Follow-Up Visit Peer Review Team Report
ACCJC Action Letter - 02-01-2021
ACCJC Action Letter - 02-01-2021
ACCJC Follow-Up Report 11-01-2021
2019 Accreditation Status and Team Report
Dear Campus Community,
I hope you are enjoying the summer. The College has received the letter from the Accreditation Commission on Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) and it reflects three commendations and two compliance recommendations. Upon review of the Institutional Self Evaluation Report (ISER) and evidence, the Commission proceeded to reaffirm accreditation for 18 months and requested a Follow-Up Report, due on October 1, 2020.
Commendations
The Commission distinguishes exemplary performance in the following areas:
Commendation 1: The team commends the College for its comprehensive and reliable services to students regardless of service location or delivery of services. This was exemplified by the implementation and tremendous success of students participating in its Inside Out Program for incarcerated students, in addition to programs that connect individuals to the college such as the Health Center and the IVC Kitchen with the Developing Garden. (II.C.3)
Commendation 2: The team commends the College for establishing the Teaching and Learning Center (TLC), as well as the associated faculty and staff that have created an impressive resource-rich environment to nurture faculty innovation. (III.C.4)
Commendation 3: The team commends the College for its commitment to students and their success and the transformation of the community as a whole through higher education. There is an organizational culture focused on students that permeates the faculty, staff, and administration. The community also expresses how strongly they feel about the value and role the college plays in being a beacon of hope and change in the region. (IV.A.1, IV.A.5, IV.B.6)
Compliance Requirements
The Commission determined that the College must substantiate compliance with the following Standards, as identified in the compliance requirements:
1. Standard I.B.2, II.A.3, II.B.3 (College Recommendation 1): In order to meet the standards the Commission requires the College to engage in a robust learning outcomes assessment process that is consistent and comprehensive to improve all programs and services.
2. Standards I.B.7, I.B.9 (College Recommendation 2): In order to meet the standards the Commission requires the College to improve the evaluation of processes and systems that are currently in place, and ensure they are more systematic and routine.
In accordance with federal regulations, compliance requirements must be addressed and the College must demonstrate that it aligns with Standards within two years.
Recommendations for Improving Institutional Effectiveness
The Team Report noted Recommendations 3, 4, 5 for improving institutional effectiveness. These recommendations do not identify current areas of deficiency in institutional practice, but consistent with its mission to foster continuous improvement through the peer review process, the Commission encourages institutions to give serious consideration to the peer reviewers' recommendations. Moreover, a final copy of the Team Report is attached for your review.
In conclusion, I agree with the Commission's action, this result was anticipated. I am confident we will meet or exceed the recommendations provided. Meanwhile, I also believe it is imperative to acknowledge that the College was provided three commendations.
I would like to sincerely thank every single team member who contributed to the development of the ISER and to everyone who participated or contributed during the peer review site visit. I realize the process of self-improvement requires tremendous time and consistent effort.
Thanks,
Martha O. Garcia, Ed.D.
2018 Institutional Self Evaluation Report
Full 2018 Institutional Self Evaluation Report
ACCJC's Response to 2016 Midterm Report
2016 Midterm Report
2015 Accreditation Status
2015 Follow-Up Report
ACCJC's Response to 2014 Follow-Up Report and Special Report
Letter - Enclosed Report of the External Evaluation Team 2014-05-06 (PDF)
Letter - Commission Action Letter on the Follow-Up Report 2014-07-08 (PDF)
2014 Accreditation Special Report
Accreditation Status and Team Report
FOLLOW UP MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT JAIME:
We are now in receipt of the full letter from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. A full report is due back to the Commission in March of next year, at which time they want us to address three recommendations. This is a reduction from the eight that originally were contained in the Team's March evaluation report, which I have also attached for your reference.
The recommendations to be addressed:
I feel very good about the Commission's action and I am confident we will meet or exceed their recommendations and prove it to them next March. Meanwhile, I also think it is important to keep this in context and remember that the Team also had four commendations in its report to us.
While all were significant, I want to note especially Commendation 3:
"It was clear to the visiting team that despite the fiscal challenges the College is overcoming, the central focus of the Board, administrators, faculty, staff and students is educational quality, student success and achievement. This was evident during team member interviews, observance of committee meetings, IVC educational projects and communications, e.g., the College Catalog."
Providing quality education is totally what we are about and it is very gratifying that the Team recognized this. We will correct the shortcomings and get even better at what we do.
INITIAL MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT JAIME:
We received word Wednesday, just before our long weekend, that we are one of six community colleges in the state that have been issued a "Warning" as the result of the comprehensive accreditation evaluation conducted on campus last March.
While this is officially a 'sanction,' it is basically what we had hoped for given the fiscal challenges we have faced over the past several years. It is the lowest sanction that is issued and really does not come as a surprise to any of us.
We remain fully accredited and will continue to work on the fiscal issues that have faced our campus. The fact that a Vice President of the ACCJC was part of our evaluation is unprecedented and truly shows the confidence the commission has on our ability to provide quality education
Of the 13 colleges that received full accreditation reviews, six were reaffirmed, six were issued warnings and one was placed on probation. The commission also voted to terminate accreditation of the City College of San Francisco which had been placed on "Show Cause" status last year.
As we all know, this could have been much worse. Again, I really want to thank all who have been involved in this process. We have not yet received the full letter from the commission, explaining the next steps but when it does arrive, I will pass it on to the greater campus community.
For your information, I am attaching the notification we received via email today.
2013-2014 Educational Master Plan
Full 2013-2014 Educational Master Plan
Academic Services
Business Services
Human Resources
Information Technology
Student Services
Progress Reports on Educational Master Plan:
2013 Accreditation Site Visit
Download the PDF Version of this Information
Accreditation is a non-governmental, peer-driven process. The federal Department of Education has certified WASC (Western Association of Schools and Colleges) and the ACCJC (Accrediting Commission of Community and Junior Colleges) as legitimate accreditors. IVC pays dues to ACCJC to voluntarily participate in the accreditation process.
Accreditation occurs on a six-year cycle. Through accreditation, an institution demonstrates that it is of high quality, and the public is assured that the institution is doing a professional job of helping students learn and achieve their educational goals. Our eligibility for financial aid and federal funds also hinges on our good standing as accredited.
Over the past three years, Imperial Valley College has worked to embed the goals of accreditation into the life of the college. To certify those efforts, a team of administrators and faculty from our region will analyze our Institutional Self-Evaluation Report and then visit us during the week of March 11-14 (Monday - Thursday). To read the complete report, go to: 2012 Institutional Self-Evaluation Report
What is the Accreditation Process?
The volunteer team consists of a team chair, a team assistant, and administrators and faculty from other community colleges in our region of the ACCJC, which includes California, Hawaii, and the Pacific Islands.
The ACCJC assembles and trains the visiting team several weeks prior to the site visit. Most team members also have participated in other site visits at community and junior colleges in the region.
Prior to arriving for the site visit, team members analyze the 2012 Imperial Valley College Institutional Self-Evaluation Report and write their preliminary findings.
The team uses guide questions and a rubric about the four broad accreditation standards to judge whether or not IVC has appropriately met the standards or has actionable improvement plans in place to do so.
Once on campus for the site visit, the team members conduct interviews and review additional evidence as necessary. They may also choose to attend any standing committee meetings, attend open forums, and visit classes. Following their interviews, evidence review, and other interactions, the team members write evaluations on their assigned standards. As a team, the members work to formulate recommendations (which are deficiencies in meeting accreditation standards). As a final act, team members sign off on their confidential recommendation to the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
What Should I Know?
Depending on your responsibilities, one or more team members may want to meet with you.
Team members may attend any standing committee meeting and interview you there. One or more team members may visit your workstation, including a class you are teaching or a student services interaction with a student.
You may be asked to provide additional evidence. If you are asked for additional evidence, please let Linda Amidon (ext. 6215) in the Instruction Office know so that we can record the request, obtain the evidence, and integrate the evidence into the electronic document file as needed.
Can I meet with the site visitors?
All staff, faculty, and students are invited to a Meet and Greet for the team on Monday, March 11, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. in the College Center.
Two college Forums will be open to all staff and you are encouraged to attend and participate. Forum 1 is Tuesday, March 5, from 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. in Room 2734. Forum 2 is Thursday, March 7, from 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. (Forum 2 has been canceled).
A formal Exit Interview, where the chair of the Site Visit Team will present an overview of the team's findings, will take place on Thursday March 14, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. in Room 2734.
What Should I Expect From the Visit?
The site visit team will be on campus Monday - Thursday, March 11-14, 2013.
The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges has eight possible actions for accredited institutions:
All but Reaffirm Accreditation require a deadline or date by which the action will take place, and the site visit team must state its rationale for assigning the recommendation.
No. The ACCJC itself makes the final determination after reviewing the visiting team's report. In our case, this will take place after its June, 2013 meeting.
Vice President of Commission Operations (ACCJC)
President (College of the Siskiyous)
Director of Planning, Assessment and Research and Accreditation Liaison Officer (College of the Siskiyous)
Dean, Academic Affairs (Los Angeles Southwest College)
Director, Institutional Research (El Camino College)
Associate Vice President for Student Affairs (University of Hawaii System)
Executive Dean (Cuesta College/North County Campus)
Faculty, Chair of Distance Education (Diablo Valley College/San Ramon Valley Campus)
Vice President, Administration and Technology (College of the Siskiyous)
The following chart presents a summary view of the actionable improvement plans contained in this Reaffirmation of Accreditation Self-Evaluation Report together with the Standards for reference:
|
Standard |
Action Plan |
Responsibility |
|
II.A.1.b |
The DE Committee, in coordination with the appropriate academic deans and the Office of Instruction, will establish criteria for a course's eligibility to be offered online by April of 2013 so that program-related classes can be again offered online in the fall of 2013. |
DE Coordinator, DE Committee, Instructional Deans, CIO |
|
II.A.1.c |
The SLO Coordinator will work in conjunction with the Vice President for Academic Services and Instructional Technology to create an efficient repository for storing course-level SLO assessment forms, as well as program-level SLOs by the end of the 2012-2013 academic year. |
SLO Coordinator, SLO Committee, CIO |
|
II.A.2.f |
The college will continue to integrate the assessment of SLOs and PLOs into its Comprehensive Program Review. No additional planning measures are needed at this time. |
SLO Coordinator |
|
II.A.2.i |
The SLO coordinator will continue to work with all campus constituencies to develop a specific plan for the assessment of PLOs. All PLOs for programs, degrees, and certificates are to be written by the end of November 2012. Programs will be assessing all of these PLOs by the end of the 2012-2013 academic year. These PLOs, once written, will be put into CurricUNET by the end of the 2012-2013 academic year, and listed in the online catalog for the 2013-2014 academic year. |
SLO Coordinator, SLO Committee |
|
II.A.6 |
Chairs and lead faculty will add PLOs for all programs in CurricUNET, and these modifications will be approved by the Curriculum Committee, the Academic Senate, and the Board of Trustees in time to be included in the 2012-2013 General College Catalog. |
Instructional Chairs and Coordinators |
|
II.A.6.c |
The Vice President for Information Technology will work through the Technology Planning Committee to continue to update the college website and to clarify roles and procedures for updating and maintaining the site. The Marketing Committee's role and membership will be discussed and revised by the end of the 2012-2013 academic year. |
CTO |
|
II.B.3.f |
Imperial Valley College's office of Admissions and Records will continue to transition its archived documents into its imaging system and anticipates that all documents will eventually be imaged at the time received. During this transition period, the Admissions and Records office and the Instruction office will continue to hold appropriate archived student records in hard copy for the period required by law. |
Director of A&R |
|
III.A.5.a |
In order to ensure that the needs of all personnel are met, the college will review the recently implemented college hour, assess the current reassigned time for faculty coordinators of Professional Development activities, conduct staff surveys related to professional development needs. |
CHRO, Staff Development Committee |
|
III.B |
Maintenance Department and Safety and Security Department personnel will conduct regular safety inspections of facilities and grounds to ensure a safe learning and working environment on campus. The college will continue to rely on input and expertise from our local agencies (Imperial County Fire Department, Imperial County Health Department, Regional Water Board, etc.) to ensure full compliance with all health and safety regulations. The college will also continue building on our relationship with the American Red Cross. |
Director of Maintenance and Director of Security |
|
III.B.2.a |
The college will be improving the process of projecting the cost of ownership when planning for new construction. All new construction and modernization projects will have a cost of ownership budget developed during the planning phase of each project. |
CBO |
|
III.C.2 |
By June 2013, the college will develop a plan to assess the effective use of technology on campus by faculty, staff, and students. |
CTO, Technology Committee |
|
III.D.1.a |
The successful development and implementation of recommendations from the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assessment Team (FCMAT) will ensure that the college will have sufficient funding to support educational programs that support a smaller student population. The college has created a Strategic Transition Action Response Team (START) to act as a recommending body to the Board of Trustees and the Superintendent/President and to facilitate the transition from recommendations to implementation. |
CBO, START Team, Budget and Fiscal Planning Committee |
|
III.D.1.b |
The Budget and Fiscal Planning Committee has begun discussion regarding the appropriate reserve level based on the specific needs of the college. It is anticipated that the committee will make a recommendation on the minimum reserve amount by June 2013. |
Budget and Fiscal Planning Committee, CBO |
|
IIID.2.e |
The college will continue to implement the recommendations of the FCMAT Management Review. |
START Team, Budget and Fiscal Planning, CBO |
|
III.D.3.a |
The college is working with FCMAT (Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team) on a fiscal review which will be presented to the Board of Trustees in December 2012. The college is committed to implementing the recommendations of the study in order to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the college and to fulfill its mission and goals. |
START Team, Budget and Fiscal Planning, CBO |
|
III.D.3.h |
The college has established a Strategic Transition Action Response Team (START), which will act as a source for communication regarding the forthcoming FCMAT report and the follow-up actions necessary. START will also prioritize and make recommendations to the college president on the implementation of the FCMAT recommendations. Additional reviews will be completed by the college's shared governance committees (Academic Senate, College Council, Budget and Fiscal Planning Committee). |
START Team, Budget and Fiscal Planning, CBO |
|
III.D.4 |
The Strategic Transition Action Response Team (START) has been formed to act as a recommending body to the president and to the Board of Trustees to prioritize and implement the recommendations of the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assessment Team report due in December 2012. The team is composed of Executive Council members as well as representatives of administration, faculty and classified staff. |
START Team, Budget and Fiscal Planning, CBO |
0
FOLLOW UP MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT JAIME:
We are now in receipt of the full letter from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. A full report is due back to the Commission in March of next year, at which time they want us to address three recommendations. This is a reduction from the eight that originally were contained in the Team's March evaluation report, which I have also attached for your reference.
The recommendations to be addressed:
I feel very good about the Commission's action and I am confident we will meet or exceed their recommendations and prove it to them next March. Meanwhile, I also think it is important to keep this in context and remember that the Team also had four commendations in its report to us.
While all were significant, I want to note especially Commendation 3:
"It was clear to the visiting team that despite the fiscal challenges the College is overcoming, the central focus of the Board, administrators, faculty, staff and students is educational quality, student success and achievement. This was evident during team member interviews, observance of committee meetings, IVC educational projects and communications, e.g., the College Catalog."
Providing quality education is totally what we are about and it is very gratifying that the Team recognized this. We will correct the shortcomings and get even better at what we do.
INITIAL MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT JAIME:
We received word Wednesday, just before our long weekend, that we are one of six community colleges in the state that have been issued a "Warning" as the result of the comprehensive accreditation evaluation conducted on campus last March.
While this is officially a 'sanction,' it is basically what we had hoped for given the fiscal challenges we have faced over the past several years. It is the lowest sanction that is issued and really does not come as a surprise to any of us.
We remain fully accredited and will continue to work on the fiscal issues that have faced our campus. The fact that a Vice President of the ACCJC was part of our evaluation is unprecedented and truly shows the confidence the commission has on our ability to provide quality education
Of the 13 colleges that received full accreditation reviews, six were reaffirmed, six were issued warnings and one was placed on probation. The commission also voted to terminate accreditation of the City College of San Francisco which had been placed on "Show Cause" status last year.
As we all know, this could have been much worse. Again, I really want to thank all who have been involved in this process. We have not yet received the full letter from the commission, explaining the next steps but when it does arrive, I will pass it on to the greater campus community.
For your information, I am attaching the notification we received via email today.
2012 Institutional Self Evaluation Report
2012-2013 Educational Master Plan